Which of the following best describes false imprisonment?

False imprisonment is best described as the unlawful restraint of a person's freedom of movement. It occurs when an individual is confined or restrained against their will without legal justification. This concept is rooted in personal rights, emphasizing that every individual has the right to move freely without any form of coercive restriction.

The term captures situations where someone is held in a location without consent, effectively infringing on their personal liberty. This could happen in various scenarios, including medical settings where a patient may be wrongfully confined or not allowed to leave without just cause.

The other options provided do not accurately define false imprisonment. For instance, legal restraint implies there is a lawful basis for the confinement, which is contrary to the definition of false imprisonment. A voluntary stay in a facility indicates that the individual has consented to their presence, negating any claim of false imprisonment. Restraining someone for their own safety, while it might involve a good intention, typically does not fall under the definition of false imprisonment unless it includes an unlawful element or a lack of consent by the restrained individual.